At about midnight of sixth and seventh May 2025, nine Rafale jets of the Indian Air Force loaded with long-range cruise missiles carrying heavy explosive charges headed for nine mosques in parts of Azad Kashmir and Pakistan. Three of them were shot down on the way while six hit their targets. They were sent by the Hindutva leaders of India to annihilate the root cause of terrorism.
You will ask how?
Well, they thought that by killing the nearly 3000 young seminary
students sleeping in the madrasa hostels attached with the mosques, they would
bring about the end of terrorism. The intention was the cold-blooded murder of
3000 poor and peaceful young men devoted to peaceful faith. Apparently Indian
spies had also placed homing devices in the hostels to reduce collateral
damage.
Fortunately,
Pakistani military intelligence had anticipated the attack and evacuated those
buildings before the terrorist attack by high-tech missiles. But quite
typically, they forgot to ask the civilian neighbors to sleep out that night,
resulting in 26 deaths and twice as many injured. This makes one wonder if the
Army school massacre in Peshawar in December 2016 was also planned and executed
by the Indian leadership through their proxies in Pakistan.
When American
President Donald Trump first heard about the incident his comment was that
India and Pakistan have been fighting for the last 1400 years. While it seemed
strange to some, it is the truth. The animosity between Pakistan and India is
the perennial war between monotheism and idolatry. Perhaps it started the day
when Prophet Muhammad demolished all the 360 idols placed in the Kaba by the
pagans of Arabia. It is mentioned in the Quran that Abraham had done the same
in his own homeland. Also, the Torah states that God, when he held court at
Mount Sinai, prohibited the making and worshipping of idols by the Jews. However,
the Aryans who had been worshipping idols at least since the time of Hammurabi
brought it to the Indian subcontinent when they migrated and made it the home
of Idolatry.
In the early
incursions of Central Asian and Afghan Muslims into India such as Mahmood
Ghaznavi, Hindu temples such as Somnath were destroyed, and their treasures
taken away as war booty. The Mughals were careful not to hurt the religious
feelings of the Hindus and mosques and temples were built side by side in many
places. A sort of harmony between monotheists and Idolaters was maintained for
nearly 300 years. It continued during the British Raj. When the British decided
to leave India, it was partitioned on the same old thesis of monotheists being
one nation the idolaters being a separate nation. Small states like Hyderabad
of the famous Nizam with majority Hindu population where assimilated into
India. But for whatever reason the Hindu ruler of Kashmir which was a
predominantly Muslim state declared accession with India and the people of
Kashmir revolted. India promptly sent its troops into Kashmir and established
it's occupation. The Kashmiris have ever since been fighting for their freedom from
Indian rule and union with the Muslim state of Pakistan. The United Nations has
passed a number of resolutions to hold plebiscite to allow the people of Kashmir
to decide whether it should be annexed with Pakistan or India. There are half a
million Indian soldiers in Kashmir, which has a population of about 12 million
i.e. one Indian soldier for every 24 Kashmiri men, women, and children.
The Indians have
quoted the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on 22nd April 2025 as their inspiration
for the invasion of Pakistan. I have read all the reports of the incident and I
found gross inconsistencies.
It says that one
fine afternoon when a large number of people were assembled in a park in the
Pahalgam area, a number of men in army uniforms appeared on the scene. It did
not raise any alarm as Indian army men are a common sight in Indian occupied
Kashmir, their ratio being one to 24 in the population. The reports then go in
two different directions.
One account is
similar to a couple of terrorist attack on passenger buses at the border
between Pakistan’s Baluchistan and Iran in which the assailants asked the
passengers about their ethnic or sectarian identity and those belonging to a
certain group were shot at close range and killed. In this case it is said that
the tourists were taken hostage and were asked to prove their identity as
Muslims. Those who failed were shot at close range. Were the same mercenaries
employed on all three occasions?
The second
account says that the terrorist started shooting indiscriminately while the
crowd ran for cover. The uniformed men ran into the jungle nearby after killing
a number of men, women and children. This scenario is very similar to what
happens so often at public places of Europe, USA, and other countries.
It is possible
that an unbiased international enquiry may find that nothing unusual had
happened that day.
