Marriage is a socio-legal process by
which a man and a woman acquire exclusive rights on one another's body, but the
souls remain free.
Looking at life without prejudice to promote evolution of civilized human thought. In the next 1000 years, all erstwhile scientific, social, moral, economic and other theories and beliefs are going to be challenged and improved. Join me and take the torch forward.
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Monday, February 02, 2015
Some Thoughts
1.
Miracles can be made to happen
2.
‘We’ is always better than I.
3.
Nobody is better than anybody else.
4.
All colors combine to make white.
5.
Everyone has something to give
6.
A free man is one who governs himself.
Friday, January 23, 2015
Charlie Hebdo and I
“Charlie
Hebdo first appeared in 1970 as a successor to
the Hara-Kiri magazine, which was banned for
mocking the death of former French President Charles de Gaulle.[10] In
1981 publication ceased, but the magazine was resurrected in 1992.” ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo)
The planned act
of violence of January 7, 2015 in which 12 people including 9 Charlie Hebdo
staff members, one guest and two policemen were gunned down in Paris by two armed
assailants was indeed a ghastly crime. It shook the world and some 40 heads of
state flew into Paris to condole the incident. But compared with the carnages that occur
frequently in Peshawar and Karachi at the hands of religious fanatics of the
same genre. it was a walk in the park. The December, 2014 terrorist attack on a
school in Peshawar in which over 130 pupils and teachers were gunned down in
cold blood did not seem to cause any stir in the world.
Prophet Muhammad was born in 570 CE in Makkah
and Islam started when he was 40 lunar years old or about 609 CE. In the last
1406 years there has not been a single incident in which a Muslim has abused or
ridiculed the Bible or the Torah or Jesus or Moses. Their names are taken with
respect by all Muslims. In fact Muslims even treat Budha, Confucious and the Hindu
avatars with a degree of deference. However the response of the followers of
other religions has been disappointing to say the least. There is a whole
history behind it.
The ridicule of Prophet Muhammad was started by
the Christians, Jews and pagans of Makkah as soon as his message became known.
The European compilers of the Bible didn’t shrink from putting in snide remarks
about Ismail son of Abraham who is claimed by the Arabs of Makkah to be their
forefather. In recent times such western intellectuals as Voltaire and Dante have
exceeded all limits of decency in their criticism of Islam and Prophet
Muhammad. The illustrations contained in Dante’s Inferno are simply outrageous
from any standards.
It seems that Western civilization and decency
have become conditioned to such vulgarities against Islam. How come that in a
society where people get jailed for denying the Holocaust, mocking the king or
queen or the death of a president are not questioned about their activities
that clearly incite hatred on the basis of religion and race?
We accept that there is small number of people
in the Muslim world who are intellectually locked in the 7th Century
and want to change the world to resemble the state of affairs of that time and
efforts are being made to contain the effects of their errant thinking. The
question is: are there similar people in the Western world who are
intellectually locked in the “middle ages”? If so, are they a small minority or an
overwhelming majority?
The following picture shared on facebook seems
to be a fair representation of the popular following of the leaders who assembled
in Paris to demonstrate solidarity with vulgarity.
Thursday, November 27, 2014
Seven Years ago
Reproduced
below is a blog I wrote exactly seven years ago with comments in today’s
perspective.
Sunday, November 25, 2007
During the past few days I have overheard the following
conversation between people at public places in Karachi:
1.
How can an order issued by the Chief of Army Staff be applicable
to anyone other than army personnel? Why do the Civil Administration and
Judiciary take notice of such orders? (They would obey the Devil’s orders if it benefits them personally.)
2.
How can a civil servant of grade 17 issue a document titled
“Statutory Regulatory Order” on Government of Pakistan letter head in defiance
of the acts of parliament, budgetary allocations and constitutional provisions?
(Because the parliament is a rubber stamp of
fixed elections.)
3.
How can the army that holds the people and institutions of
Pakistan in such contempt be expected to give its blood to defend them? (It is doing it in spite of the spite.)
4.
All of Pakistan’s problems can be solved by getting rid of about
600 top civil servants, an equal number of politicians and about 200 top
military officers. (Who bells the cat? Only a
mass uprising such as the Chinese, French or Iranian Revolution can do that.)
5.
Pervez Musharraf has not been able to find a general in the Pak
army suitable to be appointed as COAS in the last five years, will he import
one now? (He was ignoring people
with merit to keep his powers.)
6.
Pervez Musharraf is needed to maintain political stability in
Pakistan. (In or out of prison?)
7.
Benazir Bhutto in spite of being a democratic icon has no
political program or economic policy; she will only fuel further corruption if
brought to power. (As one PPP leader said
they sacrificed her to gain power and corruption is their right.)
8.
Nawaz Shrif initiated the economic policies in his first term
which are still being followed, but he has a dictatorial streak and may again
annoy his colleagues who may again conspire with the army to overthrow him. (It seems that he has formed a new private
unlimited company with his family and corrupt friends called the government of
Pakistan.)
9.
Is Nawaz Sharif the Saudi candidate for premiership or USA’s
possible alternative to Benazir? (Or the successful candidate of Riggers united?)
10.
What is the formula to empower the poor who are getting poorer
while the rich are getting richer? (Most people would say vote for Imran Khan in the next elections
whenever they are held.)
God help us.
Thursday, November 20, 2014
Origin of Existence or Mathematical God
Our scientific model of the universe is
based on Democritus’ concept of void and atoms with the addition of subatomic
particles. The concept of the automatic appearance of matter predates Democritus
when someone conjectured that life started when “the contraries separated out
of nothingness”. Today we believe that
the universe consists of equal amount of matter and antimatter, positive and
negative electrical charges, north and south poles and so on, so that the sum total
of all opposite charges, matter and antimatter etc. is zero. If all the opposites
come into contact the world will be neutralized and the void restored; only
radiant energy including optical images of every thing that has ever happened in the world will remain travelling in space unless it can find a boundary from which it can
reflect on itself with 180 degree phase shift and be annihilated.
The question now is what could have
caused the initiation or precipitation of the contraries from nothingness.
There must have been a singular event that caused the precipitation which may
have stopped or may still be going on. Unfortunately, the belief in any kind of
singularity seems to be contrary to scientific thought.
Zero was invented in the Orient while Infinity
was invented in the Western world. In a way they are two extremes and opposites
of each other and nobody seems to give much importance to their interrelationship. However, let us look at
the relationships defining these terms:
1/0 = ∞
1/∞ = 0
So we can write
1 = 0 x ∞
At first sight it appears that the summation of an infinite number of zeros yields one. It is in keeping with the well-known integral calculus convention of constant of integration which can be expressed as ∫(1+0)dx = x+c where c is a constant whose value is ascertained by boundary conditions or cognitive inference.
At first sight it appears that the summation of an infinite number of zeros yields one. It is in keeping with the well-known integral calculus convention of constant of integration which can be expressed as ∫(1+0)dx = x+c where c is a constant whose value is ascertained by boundary conditions or cognitive inference.
However, if we look long enough at the above
relationship it may be interpreted as meaning that an infinite expanse of
nothingness inherently contains a unit of existence with the possibility of splitting, expanding, transforming and flourishing. In other words, existence
is a property of the combination of nothingness and limitlessness. One can give
it any name one likes.
The contraries may have emerged due to the square rooting of the unit yielding √1 = ±1.
A common example of the application of the square-root function in nature is the conversion of pressure into velocity as in the case of breathing.
The contraries may have emerged due to the square rooting of the unit yielding √1 = ±1.
A common example of the application of the square-root function in nature is the conversion of pressure into velocity as in the case of breathing.
The divine element seems to have been there in mathematics for ever and makes its presence felt in all exercises of integral calculus.
Labels:
antimatter,
Democritus,
god,
infinity,
integral,
integratio,
limitless,
mathematical,
mathematics,
nothingness,
singularity,
zero
Saturday, October 18, 2014
Brilliant Charity
Watch this video. It is an excellent example of how commercial advertising can be turned into an act of charity. Click on the link below:
Free Beds
or copy the following URL into your browser:
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=858729877481032&set=vb.223354787685214&type=2&theater
Sunday, September 28, 2014
A Tale of Two Marches
The double-barrel sit-in at Islamabad’s D-square which had
started as Freedom and Revolution marches from Lahore has completed six
eventful weeks, but little progress has been seen in the realization of its
objectives.
Imran Khan
whose party Tehreek-e-Insaaf had received the second highest number of votes
but relatively fewer seats in the last general election has a clear-cut agenda
based on his grievance of election rigging by the ruling party PMLN of Nawaz
Sharif in May,
2013 general elections. He had to come out on the streets after all his
attempts to get justice from the election Commission and the Superior judiciary
were thwarted.
One of the most serious allegations also witnessed by the
whole nation is that while the votes were still being counted and election
results being compiled, Mr.
Nawaz Sharif appeared on Geo TV and claimed that the channel had convinced
him that his party was winning the largest number of seats in the National
assembly and was going to be the next prime minister. Surprisingly, he also
expressed his desire to have an absolute majority and appealed to some
undefined audience to give him the required number of seats. Since his party
had been ruling the Punjab for the last 5 years as well as for decades earlier,
most provincial employees involved in the electoral process were handpicked by
the Nawaz family, so the hint was obvious and was likely to have influenced the
results. As it happened, results in many constituencies defied the trends they
were following before the ‘victory speech’. Mr. Sharif’s action was highly objectionable
and if the Election Commission had gall enough it should have disqualified him
then and there. Unofficial reports indicate that if a genuine and proper audit
of votes is carried out a number of sitting ministers in Mr. Sharif’s cabinet
will be disqualified.
Prior to the march on 14th August, 2014, Mr.
Sharif had met Mr. Khan at the latter’s residence and offered him deputy-prime-minister’s
unconventional position in return for abandoning the vote audit demand. It
seems to have infuriated the Khan who now would not agree to anything less than
Mr. Sharif’s resignation and more and more Pakistanis are agreeing with him as
time passes.
The Revolution march of Allama Tahirul
Qadri’s objectives seem rather vague except that he advocated a puritanical
though modern Islamic system of government and wants the whole political system
to be wrapped up and reorganized. Mr. Sharif and many other PMLN leaders were
fervent followers of Mr. Qadri and his Barelvi sect prior to Mr. Sharif’s deportation
to Saudi Arabia who now seem to have changed their allegiance to the Saudi
supported Deobandi sect.
The recent movement started after a police invasion of his
headquarters in Lahore in which some 14 people were shot dead and over 80
injured by gunshots at chest level. The government tried to cover up the issue
as the incident report of the police did not mention any fatalities and the
families of the dead were offered Rs. 3 million each in blood money and also handsome
compensation to the injured. The victims’ families spurned the offers and
demand due legal process including the registration of complaints as they saw
it.
The unprecedented police brutality seems to have two
possible motivations. It is possible that the Punjab administration had thought
that the recently enacted Protection of Pakistan Ordinance which gives
permission to police to shoot to kill without prior authorization when faced
with armed terrorists could be twisted to justify any oppressive activity. The
second is the possibility that the government of Punjab has made peace with the
Punjabi Taliban by recruiting a few thousand of their unemployed youth in the
police and the incident may have had a sectarian aspect. However the sectarian
possibility has been sensibly ignored by everyone and although it should be
kept at the back of the mind it should not be highlighted or exploited for
political purposes. In any case, the incident reflects the utter failure of the
Punjab provincial administration and the chief-minister should have resigned
before being asked to do so.
Saturday, September 13, 2014
Recent FB Posts
It seems that Peoples party and
some other politicians are working behind the scenes to force The PMLN into a
confrontation that will bring military intervention. The reason is simple. Some
parties such as Peoples party and JUIF have a record of doing very well in
elections following military intervention.
After listening to many speeches
and arguments I have come to the conclusion that the demands of the marchers in
Islamabad are purely qualitative. Imran Khan is asking the government to be
sincere to democracy and Allama Qadri is asking the government to be honest
with the people of Pakistan. The government of Nawaz Sharif is vehemently
refusing to accept any of the demands as it considers it a negation of its
unbridled power and betrayal of its traditions.
The US state department has done
a great disservice to PM Nawaz Sharif by speaking in his favor. They have
proven Imran Khan's point. If NS can influence the US state department to give
a statement in his favor, where do Pakistan's institutions stand in an enquiry
against him?
The secret of China's progress
and prosperity is that Chairman Mao never went on a foreign trip. Just stuck
close to his people and inspired them to work honestly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)